# peer review

**URL:** https://discourse.datamethods.org/c/topical/peer-review/66.md

[Latest](https://discourse.datamethods.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.datamethods.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discourse.datamethods.org/tags.md)

---

## [About the peer review category](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/about-the-peer-review-category/600)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@f2harrell](https://discourse.datamethods.org/u/f2harrell)\
**Replies:** 0

</div>

Approaches to peer review, especially for medical journals

---

## [Agentic AI and Peer Review](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/agentic-ai-and-peer-review/28771)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@trumanfrancis](https://discourse.datamethods.org/u/trumanfrancis)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [June 5, 2026, 3:07pm UTC](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/agentic-ai-and-peer-review/28771 "2026-06-05T15:07:55Z")

</div>

I have run some of my own papers through Claude for peer review. You can upload methodologic papers to refine its performance. Do you think statistical peer review could ultimately become automated, or is it too complex…

---

## [Should all medical research papers require statistical review?](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/should-all-medical-research-papers-require-statistical-review/533)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@TFeend](https://discourse.datamethods.org/u/TFeend)\
**Replies:** 34\
**Last updated:** [June 3, 2025, 12:29pm UTC](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/should-all-medical-research-papers-require-statistical-review/533 "2025-06-03T12:29:43Z")

</div>

This tweet from Andrew Althouse (https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1035130907785658370) spawned me to finally post this question: Should all manuscripts require a statistical review? I am a surgeon. I have a yea…

---

## [Use of machine learning experts and statisticians as referees](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/use-of-machine-learning-experts-and-statisticians-as-referees/6048)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@kiwiskiNZ](https://discourse.datamethods.org/u/kiwiskiNZ)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [October 2, 2022, 8:54pm UTC](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/use-of-machine-learning-experts-and-statisticians-as-referees/6048 "2022-10-02T20:54:18Z")

</div>

I have been asked to write an article on machine learning literature in Cardiology. One of my concerns is the limited pool of potential referees who can assess the ML methodology. Q1: Does anyone know of any literatur…

---

## [The Future of Scientific Publishing](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/the-future-of-scientific-publishing/1416)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@boback](https://discourse.datamethods.org/u/boback)\
**Replies:** 57\
**Last updated:** [March 20, 2019, 6:34pm UTC](https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/the-future-of-scientific-publishing/1416 "2019-03-20T18:34:13Z")

</div>

The recent UC/Elsevier fallout has made me interested in evaluating what our idealized or future models of publishing should look like. Investigators have shared interesting ideas on how we should reform peer review a…