Thanks for taking the time @f2harrell, I appreciate it. But I’ll have to disagree. I know you don’t much like RRs, as per this post, for instance, but I don’t think ORs are easy to interpret or any easier to interpret than RRs. The usual difficulty with RRs, knowing the baseline risk, is taken as given for this problem.
This is a good point. But in the simple case of a logistic regression, is it not the case that the non-linearity of the model is taken into account by the transformations I discuss in my original post?