Great, thank you.
I’m critically appraising this article for a systematic review using the CHAMP checklist https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/55/18/1009.2.
My concern is that what the authors of this study did invalidates their analysis/results, according to items 8 and 9 from CHAMP.
I wonder whether that’s a fair conclusion from my part. Or perhaps I could be more lenient…
What’s your take on this, Professor @f2harrell?