From the paper:
Methods: This study included 116 patients with 72 malignant and 44 benign breast lesions who underwent CAIP IRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE dynamic contrast-enhanced (CDT-VIBE DCE) and readout-segmented difusion-weighted magnetic resonance examination.
Discussion of skewness or kurtosis with these very small sample sizes strike me as fundamentally mistaken. I’m reminded of the following 2 articles from Quality Digest by statistical process control expert Donald J. Wheeler:
Wheeler, D (2011) Problems with Skewness and Kurtosis: Part 1 Quality Digest (link)
Wheeler, D (2011) Problems with Skewness and Kurtosis: Part 2 Quality Digest (link)
(Both articles are accessible if you provide an email for their list).
These two articles provide the formulas to calculate skew and kurtosis and shows the relationship to the standard deviation. The mean, the variance, skewness, and kurtosis are the first 4 moments of probability distributions and play an important role in statistical theory.
The articles also show why shape statistics are hardly used in practice.
Suffice it to say – the small samples reported in the paper do not have enough information to estimate either of the shape parameters. I’m not sure what was learned from the study.