Thanks for this interesting comparison of summary techniques, Robert! One point that your table makes very clear about S-values is that the 8 bits of evidence accumulated thus far against the null can only increase with addition of more studies. (This has long been appreciated; my point is only that the additive nature of the S-value makes this especially clear.)
If you were employing S-values as advised by Rafi & Greenland (2020), you would be “displaying the compatibility of the observed data with various hypotheses of interest, rather than focusing on single hypothesis tests or interval estimates.” Do the underlying papers enable such deep examination of substantive biomechanics & sports-science theories?